2 Genesis, Chapter 21 - "Out, out, damned Hagar!"

When we last left the Amurrites, we had determined that Abe was definitely Semitic, that there was a reasonably good chance he was Akkadian, or possibly even an Amurrite, and that the god who spoke to Abram in Ur, may have been Ammur, el Shaddai, "Lord of the Mountain," god of the Amurrites, and part-time Notary Public. Let's hold that thought until we get to Moses, when I'll have yet another surprise for you, backed up by Jewish biblical scholars.
I've discussed at length, the Documentary Hypothesis, and how events alleged to have taken place in the second and third millennium, were never written down until the mid-to early first millennium (you have to work backward when dealing with BCE, like a count-down), with all the inherent slips "'twixt the cup and the lip," that that entails.
There may well be those of you out there who might argue that someone jotted down the details of these events as they were happening, but that they simply weren't collected into an organized form, like a book, until those later times.
Before we begin with this chapter's story, let me give you a couple of reasons as to why that is highly unlikely.
But first, can anybody give this quotation a quick glance and tell me what it says:
"Whan that Aprill, with his shoures sooteI didn't see a lot of hands shoot up. Having problems with it?
The droghte of March hath perced to the roote
And bathed every veyne in swich licour,
Of which vertu engendred is the flour;
Whan Zephirus eek with his sweete breeth
Inspired hath in every holt and heeth
The tendre croppes, and the yonge sonne
Hath in the Ram his halfe cours yronne,
And smale foweles maken melodye,
That slepen al the nyght with open eye-
(So priketh hem Nature in hir corages);
Thanne longen folk to goon on pilgrimages
And palmeres for to seken straunge strondes
To ferne halwes, kowthe in sondry londes;
And specially from every shires ende
Of Engelond, to Caunterbury they wende,
The hooly blisful martir for to seke
That hem hath holpen, whan that they were seeke."
I can't imagine why - it's written in perfectly good English.
Fourteenth century English, to be exact, by Geoffrey Chaucer (between 1387 and 1400 AD), in the Preface to his epic work, The Canterbury Tales.
You see, like everything else, languages evolve. A thousand years hence, the English we speak now will be as unintelligible as the words of Chaucer are today - to the Jetsons of the future, we'll be the Flintstones (in fact, the way things are going, it will likely sound a lot more like Cantonese, than Canterbury).
Noah (If He Ever Existed), was dated to approximately 2600 BCE, and Abe (I.H.E.E.), somewhere between 2350 and 1813 BCE, depending on which prevaricator you choose to believe. If they spoke "Hebrew," whatever that was, or Akkadian (as is strongly suspected), either language would have greatly evolved by 950 BCE, when the Yahwist Source first put quill to papyrus, or set stylus to soft clay.
The second reason is simply that until quite recently, most biblical scholars believed that Hebrew writing dated somewhere between the 8th and 7th centuries, BCE, until shards of pottery were unearthed in Israel, upon which a few seemingly religious phrases, in an ancient Hebrew script (much like the ancient English script, above), were found, carbon-dated to 1000 BCE, several centuries earlier than anticipated. But the date of the inscription, combined with the primitive quality of the vocabulary, makes it clear that neither Noah, Abraham, nor Moses - all of whom lived centuries earlier - had a hand in writing the scriptures. It would be like maintaining that Chaucer had contributed to writing the American Declaration of Independence, which I can read, so he didn't.
OK, let's take a look at how this god's Chosen One handled breakups.
21:1 "And the Lord visited Sarah as he had said and the Lord did unto Sarah as he had spoken (After, of course a brief stay in Abimelech's harem).Notice that Chapter 19 flows smoothly into Chapter 21, as though Chapter 20 had never existed. There's a good reason for that - when Chapters 19 and 21 were written, Chapter 20 hadn't existed, and wouldn't for another hundred years.
21:2 "For Sarah conceived, and bare Abraham a son in his old age (doubtless clawing his way past 90 +/- years' worth of cobwebs), at the set time of which God had spoken to him.
21:3 "And Abraham called the name of his son that was born unto him, whom Sarah bare unto him, Issac.
21:4 "And Abraham circumcised his son Isaac being eight days old, as God had commanded him.
21:5 "And Abraham was an hundred years old, when his son Issac was born unto him.
21:6 "And Sarah said, God hath made me to laugh, so that all that hear will laugh with me.
21:7 "And she said, Who would have said unto Abraham, that Sarah should have given children suck? for I have born him a son in his old age."
21:8 "And the child grew, and was weaned: and Abraham made a great feast the same day that Issac was weaned.Remember now, in Genesis, Chapter 16, Sarah couldn't tolerate Hagar's smugness when she conceived with 89-year old Abe's child, Ishma-el. Abe gave Sarai permission to beat the crap out of Hagar, to the extent that Hagar ran away, but an angel told her to suck it up and go back. Now Sarah felt Hagar's son was mocking her, and wanted to rid herself of the competition forever. Sweet bunch, this god picked to dote on.
21:9 "And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, which she had born unto Abraham, mocking.
21:10 "Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Issac."
21:11 "And the thing was very grievous in Abraham's sight because of his son.In the 1960's, comedian Flip Wilson, in his comedy routines, used to say, "De debble made me do it!" In Abe's case, he had a different authorization for his upcoming behavior, he had his god's OK.
21:12 "And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called.
21:13 "And also of the son of the bondwoman will I make a great nation, because he is thy seed."
21:14 "And Abraham rose up early in the morning (we will later learn that that is Abe's habit, when he's trying to pull something underhanded), and took bread and a bottle of water, and gave it unto Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, and the child, and sent her away: and she departed, and wandered in the wilderness of Beer-sheba.Abe had a "bondwoman," a slave as it were, who had no say over anything the Abraham family chose to do with her, except possibly run away, but on the plain, near no major cities, where was she to run? Sarah decided it was OK for Abe to father a child by Hagar, and again, Hagar had no control in the matter. He had sex with her, she became pregnant, all without her consent, she bore his child, then ten years later, Sarah conceived, had a child at 90, and suddenly Hagar was yesterday's mashed potatoes. Let me leave an image in your mind as to the moral standards of this god's pick of the litter.
21:15 "And the water was spent in the bottle, and she cast the child under one of the shrubs.
21:16 "And she went, and sat her down over against him a good way off, as it were a bowshot (it's really not clear how one can sit next to someone, yet be a bow-shot's distance away, but we both trust the Yahwist Source knows exactly what he's talking about, don't we?): for she said, Let me not see the death of the child. And she sat over against him, and lift up her voice, and wept."

Hagar and Ishmael
Quite the heroic figure, isn't he? I know if I wanted to start a religion, Abe would certainly top my list of choices, as to the one I'd pick as patriarch!
TNAB expresses the belief that Chapter 21 here was written by the Elohist (E) Source, while Chapter 16 was written by the Yahwist (J) Source, and that they are essentially the same story, written by the two different groups. Yes, I'll be the first to agree that they differ significantly, but as I've stressed from the beginning, this is what happens when you start out with what you might believe to be a fact, pass it down through a few hundred generations, and then set it down in print. Further, there was ample opportunity for the Redactor to try and weave them together into a coherent tale.
For example, Paul Bunyon may have been a real man, an above average lumberjack, but by the time the legend-makers finished with him, he had created the Grand Canyon by dragging his axe in the dirt behind him. But no one tells us that our immortal soul is in danger of eternal damnation if we decline to accept as fact, the Paul Bunyon story. Personally, I believe it.
Also, THNB translates 21:14 from the Hebrew as reading, "Early the next morning Abraham got some bread and a skin of water and gave them to Hagar. Then, placing the child on her back, he sent her away."
Chapter 16:16 tells us, "And Abraham was fourscore (80) and six years old when Hagar bare Ishma-el to Abram." Chapter 21:5 informs us, "And Abraham was an hundred years old, when his son Issac was born unto him." Clearly, Ishma-el and Issac are fourteen years apart, yet 21:14 states that Abraham put Ishma-el on Hagar's back, and 21:18 says god told Hagar to hold the child in her hand, which she could only do if he were small.
Here's where things really get complicated. Both Chapters 20 and 21 were written by the Elohist (E) Source, c.850 BCE, who, having no reference material at his diaposal, assumed Ishma-el to have been very young when Abe sent Hagar packing with just a jug of water and a loaf of bread. which would explain why Hagar was able to hold the baby in her hand. It was the Priestly (P) Source (c.-722 BCE) who provided the data about Abe's and Ike's and Ishma-el's relative ages.
The tale to follow, about Abraham and Abimelech, uses material that the Yahwist (J) Source (c.950 BCE) applied to the story in of Abe and Pharoah in Chapter 12, and which, as we shall see, he used again in Chapter 26. The E Source may have copied it directly from the J Source, since E wrote a hundred years after J, or more likely, since J wrote from the Southern kingdom of Judea and E from the northern kingdom of Israel (you'll learn about all of this, once Moses brings the Israelites out of Egypt and they finish wandering in the desert for forty years), the likelihood is greater that E wrote from the same passed-down legend from which J also drew, but the story had evolved differently between the two groups over time.
Are you thoroughly confused yet? Wasn't it a whole lot simpler when we just believed that Moses wrote the whole thing? I guess that's the price of growing up, you kinda miss Santa Claus from time to time.
Sorry, Hagar, your 15 minutes of fame have come and gone. Much like Lot, we never hear from her or her son again, they served their literary purpose, and that's what they were there for.
Interestingly, followers of Islam, on the word of Muhammad, contend that Muhammad was a direct descendant of Ishma-el, first-born of Abraham, but has anyone done a scientific follow-up - I mean, other than taking Muhammad's word for it?
Before we leave Abe and Abimelech, just another word about the Philistines, of whom Abimelech was stated in the Bible as having been a member. I told you in the last chapter that the Philistines were of Aegean origin, having migrated to the shores of ancient Palestine after their homeland was destroyed by the eruption of the volcano, Thera. I've also mentioned that Abe's birthdate falls somewhere between 2350 and 1813 BCE.
The Philistines are mentioned over 250 times in the Bible. Joseph Blenkinsopp, Emeritus Professor of Biblical Studies at the University of Notre Dame, assures us that Philistines did not arrive until centuries after the earliest possible date for Abraham's time, placing the arrival of the Philistines at around 1200 BCE and Gerar as having been little more than a village until 800-700 BCE. Twenty one chapters into the book, and we're still groping blindly for a kernel of truth.
21:17 "And God heard the voice of the lad (because he's male, not female like Hagar); and the angel of God called to Hagar out of heaven, and said unto her. What aileth thee, Hagar? (Oh, I don't know, being stranded in the wilderness with my young son, no food, no water, nowhere to go, but other than that, we're having a really super day!) fear not; for God hath heard the voice of the lad where he is (Heard the voice of the lad? What's Hagar, chopped liver? I can't speak for all gods, but this one's a misogynist!).There's an interesting point made by The New American Bible, published by the Catholics. Remember the story, from 2 Genesis, Chapter 16, where Hagar was so mistreated by Sarah that she ran away, but god or an angel or some supernatural creature (I can't find a consensus of agreement anywhere) told her to suck it up, go back, and take her lumps. I was sure you would.
21:18 "Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him in thine hand; for I will make him a great nation (Ever try to hold a ten-year old in your hand?).
21:19 "And god opened her eyes, and she saw a well of water; and she went, and filled the bottle with water, and gave the lad to drink.
21:20 "And god was with the lad; and he grew, and dwelt in the wilderness, and became an archer.
21:21 "And he dwelt in the wilderness of Paran: and his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt."
TNAB expresses the belief that Chapter 21 here was written by the Elohist (E) Source, while Chapter 16 was written by the Yahwist (J) Source, and that they are essentially the same story, written by the two different groups. Yes, I'll be the first to agree that they differ significantly, but as I've stressed from the beginning, this is what happens when you start out with what you might believe to be a fact, pass it down through a few hundred generations, and then set it down in print. Further, there was ample opportunity for the Redactor to try and weave them together into a coherent tale.
For example, Paul Bunyon may have been a real man, an above average lumberjack, but by the time the legend-makers finished with him, he had created the Grand Canyon by dragging his axe in the dirt behind him. But no one tells us that our immortal soul is in danger of eternal damnation if we decline to accept as fact, the Paul Bunyon story. Personally, I believe it.
Also, THNB translates 21:14 from the Hebrew as reading, "Early the next morning Abraham got some bread and a skin of water and gave them to Hagar. Then, placing the child on her back, he sent her away."
Chapter 16:16 tells us, "And Abraham was fourscore (80) and six years old when Hagar bare Ishma-el to Abram." Chapter 21:5 informs us, "And Abraham was an hundred years old, when his son Issac was born unto him." Clearly, Ishma-el and Issac are fourteen years apart, yet 21:14 states that Abraham put Ishma-el on Hagar's back, and 21:18 says god told Hagar to hold the child in her hand, which she could only do if he were small.
Here's where things really get complicated. Both Chapters 20 and 21 were written by the Elohist (E) Source, c.850 BCE, who, having no reference material at his diaposal, assumed Ishma-el to have been very young when Abe sent Hagar packing with just a jug of water and a loaf of bread. which would explain why Hagar was able to hold the baby in her hand. It was the Priestly (P) Source (c.-722 BCE) who provided the data about Abe's and Ike's and Ishma-el's relative ages.
The tale to follow, about Abraham and Abimelech, uses material that the Yahwist (J) Source (c.950 BCE) applied to the story in of Abe and Pharoah in Chapter 12, and which, as we shall see, he used again in Chapter 26. The E Source may have copied it directly from the J Source, since E wrote a hundred years after J, or more likely, since J wrote from the Southern kingdom of Judea and E from the northern kingdom of Israel (you'll learn about all of this, once Moses brings the Israelites out of Egypt and they finish wandering in the desert for forty years), the likelihood is greater that E wrote from the same passed-down legend from which J also drew, but the story had evolved differently between the two groups over time.
Are you thoroughly confused yet? Wasn't it a whole lot simpler when we just believed that Moses wrote the whole thing? I guess that's the price of growing up, you kinda miss Santa Claus from time to time.
Sorry, Hagar, your 15 minutes of fame have come and gone. Much like Lot, we never hear from her or her son again, they served their literary purpose, and that's what they were there for.
Interestingly, followers of Islam, on the word of Muhammad, contend that Muhammad was a direct descendant of Ishma-el, first-born of Abraham, but has anyone done a scientific follow-up - I mean, other than taking Muhammad's word for it?
21:22 "And it came to pass at that time, that Abimelech and Phichol the chief captain of his host spake unto Abraham, saying, God is with thee in all that thou doest (remember those names, you'll hear them again).Note that in 21:31, Abe, "called that place Beersheba," yet much earlier, in 21:14, Hagar, "departed, and wandered in the wilderness of Beer-sheba." How could she have wandered in a place by that name, which hadn't yet been given the name until 21:31? This is why you really need to thoroughly check the credentials of any applying for the position of editor, before putting them on the payroll
21:23 "Now therefore swear unto me by God that thou wilt not do falsely by me, nor with my son, nor with my son's son: but according to the kindness that I have done unto thee, thou shalt do unto me, and unto the land wherein thou hast sojourned.
21:24 "And Abraham said, I will swear.
21:25 "And Abraham reproved Abimelech because of a well of water, which Abimelech's servants had violently taken away (Where were Abe's 318 commando-shepherds that fought off four seasoned armies?).
21:26 "And Abimelech said, I wot (know) not who hath done this thing: neither didst thou tell me, neither yet heard I of it, but today.
21:27 "And Abraham took sheep and oxen, and gave them unto Abimelech; and both of them made a covenant.
21:28 "And Abraham set seven ewe lambs of the flock by themselves.
21:29 "And Abimelech said unto Abraham, What mean these seven ewe lambs which thou hast set by themselves?
21:30 "And he (Abe) said, For these seven ewe lambs shalt thou take of my hand, that they may be a witness unto me, that I have digged this well (Abimelech gave Abe 1000 pieces of silver worth of livestock - Genesis, Chapter 20 - in exchange for the lend-lease of Abe's sister/wife, and Abe gave a few back - talk about a stand-up guy!).
21:31 "Wherefore he (Abe) called that place Beersheba ('Beer' = 'well,' not Budweiser, as some might imagine); because there they sware both of them.
21:32 "Thus they made a covenant at Beersheba; because there they sware, both of them.
21:33 "And Abraham planted a grove in Beersheba, and called there on the name of the Lord, the everlasting God. (Would that be, "El Shaddai"?)
21:34 "And Abraham sojourned in the Philistines' land many days."
Before we leave Abe and Abimelech, just another word about the Philistines, of whom Abimelech was stated in the Bible as having been a member. I told you in the last chapter that the Philistines were of Aegean origin, having migrated to the shores of ancient Palestine after their homeland was destroyed by the eruption of the volcano, Thera. I've also mentioned that Abe's birthdate falls somewhere between 2350 and 1813 BCE.
The Philistines are mentioned over 250 times in the Bible. Joseph Blenkinsopp, Emeritus Professor of Biblical Studies at the University of Notre Dame, assures us that Philistines did not arrive until centuries after the earliest possible date for Abraham's time, placing the arrival of the Philistines at around 1200 BCE and Gerar as having been little more than a village until 800-700 BCE. Twenty one chapters into the book, and we're still groping blindly for a kernel of truth.
In Search of Mrs. God
Amurru didn't hold much faith in abstinence. He had a wife known as Asherah, a goddess of fertility, who went by a number of names, depending on which language you spoke.
• Ašratum
• Ashratu
• Asherdu
• Aserdu
• Ashertu
• Asertu
• Astarte
• Athtart
• Athtarat
• Ashtaroth
• and eventually, Ishtar
He also had a sweet little thing on the side, named Belit-Sheri, who was known as the "Lady of the Desert," a goddess who was in charge of keeping records of everything everyone did, in preparation for a final judgement - in short, she was making a list, checking it twice, and gonna find out who's naughty and nice. How much of a lady she was, was known only to Amurru.
Some of the Ammurites moved westward, along the trade route opened originally by Sargon and reestablished by the Amurrite ruler of Mesopotamia, Hammurabi, as did Abraham, and when they did, they took their god with them, as did Abraham.
Although there were already Amurrrites in the Cannan/Palestine area from before the Ammurite immigration into Mesopotamia, this wave of Ammurite settlers were more metropolitan, and less nomadic than their country cousins. In fact, there is a legend that arose out of Mesopotamia (where the Akkadian name for Amurru was, "Martu") - it seems (in the legend) that the daughter of another god was given an opportunity to wed Amurru/Martu, and her answer was, "I'll marry Martu." Now you might think that's an inside joke that you have to be ancient Akkadian to get, but what it meant, was that Amurru, god of the Nomadic Amurrites, was basically considered unsophisticated, but once the Amurrites began to rise within the Akkadian/Mesopotamian economic and political system, they began to acquire a greater degree of sophistication, and as they did, so did their god. The young goddess was saying that she would prefer to marry Martu, the urbane, sophisticated version of Amurru. It might have been a little funnier to the Akkadians --
As those Amurrites who migrated westward settled in Canaan, both peoples were Semitic, their customs and languages similar, and it was easy to assimilate into Canaanite society, which they did. We earlier discussed the gods of the Sumerians, and how, after they were infiltrated by the Akkadians, the lines blurred between their various gods. The same thing happened in Canaan.
Amurru, the god of the nomads, the Lord of the Mountain, El Shaddai, blended perfectly into the Canaanite pantheon, where the Canaanite god, "El," who also lived on a mountain, and "El Shaddai" were indistinguishable. And not at all coincidentally, the Canaanite god, El, had a wife, named - you'd never guess it in a million years - Asherah.
According to The Oxford Companion To World Mythology (David Leeming, Oxford University Press, 2005, page 118),
I've mentioned William G. Dever in 2 Genesis, Chapter 13, as being a former Christian, turned atheist, and an American archaeologist, specializing in the history of Israel and the Near East in Biblical times. He was Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Arizona in Tucson from 1975 to 2002. He is a Distinguished Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology at Lycoming College in Pennsylvania.
In his book, Did God Have A Wife? Archaeology And Folk Religion In Ancient Israel (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company 2005), he comments,
In essence then, Dever is saying that ancient Israel had its own Religious Right, and used the four Sources and the Redactor to get what would amount to their evangelical message across to the Jewish people, making them believe that it came from god. The Bible represented the views of the Jewish religious elite, and had little to do with the everyday lives of the Jewish people.
Dever further commented, “Ultimately, the campaign to eliminate the goddess has failed. Asherah was buried long ago by the Establishment, now, archaeology has excavated her." Dever is quite certain that he knows who the Asherah of ancient Israel and of the biblical texts was - she was the wife or consort of the god of Genesis.
pax vobiscum,
archaeopteryx




• Ašratum
• Ashratu
• Asherdu
• Aserdu
• Ashertu
• Asertu
• Astarte
• Athtart
• Athtarat
• Ashtaroth
• and eventually, Ishtar
He also had a sweet little thing on the side, named Belit-Sheri, who was known as the "Lady of the Desert," a goddess who was in charge of keeping records of everything everyone did, in preparation for a final judgement - in short, she was making a list, checking it twice, and gonna find out who's naughty and nice. How much of a lady she was, was known only to Amurru.
Some of the Ammurites moved westward, along the trade route opened originally by Sargon and reestablished by the Amurrite ruler of Mesopotamia, Hammurabi, as did Abraham, and when they did, they took their god with them, as did Abraham.
Although there were already Amurrrites in the Cannan/Palestine area from before the Ammurite immigration into Mesopotamia, this wave of Ammurite settlers were more metropolitan, and less nomadic than their country cousins. In fact, there is a legend that arose out of Mesopotamia (where the Akkadian name for Amurru was, "Martu") - it seems (in the legend) that the daughter of another god was given an opportunity to wed Amurru/Martu, and her answer was, "I'll marry Martu." Now you might think that's an inside joke that you have to be ancient Akkadian to get, but what it meant, was that Amurru, god of the Nomadic Amurrites, was basically considered unsophisticated, but once the Amurrites began to rise within the Akkadian/Mesopotamian economic and political system, they began to acquire a greater degree of sophistication, and as they did, so did their god. The young goddess was saying that she would prefer to marry Martu, the urbane, sophisticated version of Amurru. It might have been a little funnier to the Akkadians --
As those Amurrites who migrated westward settled in Canaan, both peoples were Semitic, their customs and languages similar, and it was easy to assimilate into Canaanite society, which they did. We earlier discussed the gods of the Sumerians, and how, after they were infiltrated by the Akkadians, the lines blurred between their various gods. The same thing happened in Canaan.
Amurru, the god of the nomads, the Lord of the Mountain, El Shaddai, blended perfectly into the Canaanite pantheon, where the Canaanite god, "El," who also lived on a mountain, and "El Shaddai" were indistinguishable. And not at all coincidentally, the Canaanite god, El, had a wife, named - you'd never guess it in a million years - Asherah.
According to The Oxford Companion To World Mythology (David Leeming, Oxford University Press, 2005, page 118),
"It seems almost certain that the God of the Jews evolved gradually from the Canaanite El, who was in all likelihood the 'God of Abraham'...If El was the high god of Abraham - Elohim, the prototype of Yahveh - Asherah was his wife, and there are archeological indications that she was perceived as such before she was in effect 'divorced' in the context of emerging Judaism of the seventh century BCE. (See 2 Kings 23:15)"There are more than 40 references to Asherah in the Bible, which time and space don't allow me to list here, but we'll note them as we come to them, I promise.
I've mentioned William G. Dever in 2 Genesis, Chapter 13, as being a former Christian, turned atheist, and an American archaeologist, specializing in the history of Israel and the Near East in Biblical times. He was Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Arizona in Tucson from 1975 to 2002. He is a Distinguished Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology at Lycoming College in Pennsylvania.
In his book, Did God Have A Wife? Archaeology And Folk Religion In Ancient Israel (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company 2005), he comments,
"We do not know for sure what the belief in the god Yahweh meant for the average Israelite. Although the biblical text tells us that most Israelites worshiped Yahweh alone, we know that this is not true... The discoveries of the last fifteen years have given us a great deal of information about the worship of the ancient Israelites. It seems that we have to take the worship of the goddess Asherah more seriously than ever before."The core of the book lies in chapters 5 (Archaeological Evidence for Folk Religions in Ancient Israel), 6 (The Goddess Asherah and Her Cult), and 7 (Asherah, Women's Cults, and Official Yahwism). These chapters describe folk religion in ancient, mainly polytheistic, Israel, which, Dever points out, was the reality in the religious lives of most people. The last two chapters (ch. 8: From Polytheism to Monotheism; ch. 9: What Does the Goddess Do to Help) sum up the book, concluding that monotheism is an artificial phenomenon, the product of most of the elite, nationalist parties who wrote and edited the Hebrew Bible that was adopted during the Babylonian exile as a response to the trauma of the conquest and subsequently enforced by the returning elite during the early Persian period. Dever also notes that folk religion and the role of the goddess did not disappear under official monotheistic Yahwism, but instead went underground, to find a home in the magic and mysticism of later Judaism.
In essence then, Dever is saying that ancient Israel had its own Religious Right, and used the four Sources and the Redactor to get what would amount to their evangelical message across to the Jewish people, making them believe that it came from god. The Bible represented the views of the Jewish religious elite, and had little to do with the everyday lives of the Jewish people.
Dever further commented, “Ultimately, the campaign to eliminate the goddess has failed. Asherah was buried long ago by the Establishment, now, archaeology has excavated her." Dever is quite certain that he knows who the Asherah of ancient Israel and of the biblical texts was - she was the wife or consort of the god of Genesis.
pax vobiscum,
archaeopteryx







Once again, brilliant, research deep and profound, educational and downright informative. Why don't they teach this in Theology Classes - what do they actually learn in Theology Classes, I would like to know?
Reply to this
RE: "Why don't they teach this in Theology Classes?"
I think you know the answer to that - because then they would be out of business.
a
Reply to this